Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Metodos Mistos Description An account of the resource Combinação de métodos QUAN & QUAL com integração de dados e/ou resultados, utilizando-se de mais de um método, metodologia, abordagem, visão de mundo ou paradigma e a integração dos resultados desses diferentes componentes. Subject The topic of the resource Métodos quantitativo Métodos qualitativos Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Laboratorio ECoS Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Pierre Pluye; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Frances Griffiths; Janique Johnson-Lafleur Description An account of the resource <p>A new form of literature review has emerged, Mixed Studies Review (MSR). These reviews include qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. In the present paper, we examine MSRs in health sciences, and provide guidance on processes that should be included and reported. However, there are no valid and usable criteria for concomitantly appraising the methodological quality of the qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. Objective: To propose criteria for concomitantly appraising the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies or study components. Design: A three-step critical review was conducted. Data sources: 2322 references were identified in MEDLINE, and their titles and abstracts were screened; 149 potentially relevant references were selected and the full-text papers were examined; 59 MSRs were retained and scrutinized using a deductive–inductive qualitative thematic data analysis. This revealed three types of MSR: convenience, reproducible, and systematic. Review methods: Guided by a proposal, we conducted a qualitative thematic data analysis of the quality appraisal procedures used in the 17 systematic MSRs (SMSRs). Results: Of 17 SMSRs, 12 showed clear quality appraisal procedures with explicit criteria but no SMSR used valid checklists to concomitantly appraise qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. In two SMSRs, criteria were developed following a specific procedure. Checklists usually contained more criteria than needed. In four SMSRs, a reliability assessment was described or mentioned. While criteria for quality appraisal were usually based on descriptors that require specific methodological expertise (e.g., appropriateness), no SMSR described the fit between reviewers’ expertise and appraised studies. Quality appraisal usually resulted in studies being ranked by methodological quality.</p> Subject The topic of the resource Literature review; Methodology; Mixed methods research; Mixed Studies Reviews; Quality appraisal; Research synthesis Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived - Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available - Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource - Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource - Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource - Relation A related resource - Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource - Language A language of the resource - Type The nature or genre of the resource - Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020748909000145?via%3Dihub Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant -